EU Invites Public Input on AI Regulations: What Could Be Banned and Why It Matters

The European Union (EU) is taking bold steps to regulate AI. As it finalizes the new AI Act, the EU has opened a consultation period (here), inviting feedback from industry leaders, businesses, academics, and the public. This feedback will help shape rules around AI in Europe, balancing innovation with human rights protection.

The EU is asking for input on two key issues: defining AI and deciding which uses to ban. The consultation closes on December 11, 2024, with final guidance expected in early 2025. Here’s a closer look at what this means.

Defining AI: Drawing a Line Between Complex and Simple Software

What makes software “artificial intelligence”? This question isn’t easy to answer. The EU’s AI Act attempts to draw a clear line between AI systems and simpler software, and it wants feedback to refine this definition.

Some basic programs, like calculators or simple data processors, might not fall under the new regulations. But more complex systems that use machine learning to make predictions or decisions probably will. By setting clearer boundaries, the EU hopes to apply regulations only to high-impact AI systems.

Key Questions for Defining AI:

• Complexity: Should advanced features like machine learning and neural networks define AI?
• Practical Examples: Which real-world software falls on the borderline, and where should regulators draw the line?
• Innovation Impact: Can rules be flexible enough to encourage AI development?

Where to Draw the Line on “Unacceptable Risk”

The EU’s main focus is on deciding which AI uses pose an “unacceptable risk.” Some cases are already banned, like government social scoring systems that rank individuals based on behavior, a model used in China. These systems can erode privacy and restrict freedoms. The EU considers them a threat to human rights.

But what about other high-risk AI uses? Some tools, like emotion recognition and predictive policing, also raise ethical concerns. The EU wants specific examples and insights on these issues to help shape fair and effective regulations.

Examples of High-Risk AI Uses Under Review:

• Social Scoring: Systems that rank people and control access to services or rights.
• Emotion Recognition: Tools that interpret emotions, which could be misused for manipulation or discrimination.
• Predictive Policing: Crime prediction software, which can lead to profiling and bias.

Why This Matters for Businesses, Citizens, and AI Developers

For businesses, the new AI Act may require adjustments in how they design and sell AI products. Certain features may need to be changed or removed if they fall into banned categories. While this could increase compliance costs, it also pushes for transparency and responsible development.

For everyday people, the Act promises better protection for privacy and freedom. By regulating high-risk AI uses, the EU aims to safeguard citizens against misuse of their data and potential biases.

Developers may also feel the impact, as they’ll need to consider ethical and privacy standards more carefully. This focus on responsible AI could inspire new ideas and solutions that make AI safer for everyone.

The Next Steps Toward Safer AI in Europe

After the consultation period ends on December 11, 2024, the EU will analyze the feedback. The final guidance document, expected in early 2025, will clarify the rules for defining and banning AI uses.

If you work with AI or use it in your products, now is your chance to weigh in. Europe’s approach could set a global standard, making this a unique opportunity to influence the future of AI.