Chinese

Chinese Colleges Introduce Measures to Restrict Students’ Use of AI

Chinese universities are now drawing the line to ensure the ethical and effective use of AI.

Students across China have embraced AI tools as an essential part of their academic toolkit. For instance, Lin, a 22-year-old law major in Shanghai, relied entirely on generative AI to create polished PowerPoint presentations for his intellectual property law course.

“The AI delivered a complete presentation in minutes, adjusting styles based on my instructions,” Lin shared. His experience reflects a broader trend among Chinese millennials who leverage AI to simplify tasks such as writing papers and preparing assignments.

These tools are not just limited to basic functions. Many students, like Lin, have honed their skills to determine which AI platforms excel at specific tasks, making them integral to modern academic life.

The Academic Dilemma: Innovation vs. Integrity

While AI tools offer incredible efficiency, they raise concerns about academic integrity and skill development. Fudan University in Shanghai was the first in China to establish clear regulations to limit the misuse of AI in undergraduate theses.

The rules ban AI usage for core academic tasks such as designing research frameworks, drafting thesis structures, or summarizing conclusions. Violations can result in penalties as severe as degree revocation.

According to Fudan’s academic affairs division, these restrictions aim to cultivate critical thinking, originality, and effective communication skills in students. “We want to empower students, not have them outsource creativity to machines,” said a university representative.

A Balanced Approach to AI Usage

Fudan’s guidelines aren’t entirely restrictive. The university allows AI tools to aid with literature reviews, data visualization, and reference management – provided students receive supervisor approval.

This balanced approach reflects a broader trend in Chinese higher education to coexist with AI responsibly.

Other universities have implemented similar measures:

  • Tianjin University of Science and Technology: Warns students if AI content exceeds 40% of their thesis.
  • Beijing Normal University: Requires AI-generated content to be marked in red and limited to 20% of assignments.

These policies underline a shared goal: integrating AI without undermining the value of human intellect and effort.

We read all the AI news and test the best tools so you don’t have to. Then we send 30,000+ profesionnals a weekly email showing how to leverage it all to: 📈 Increase their income 🚀 Get more done ⚡ Save time.

Challenges of Overuse and Misuse

Despite regulations, the overuse of AI remains a pressing issue.

Research involving over 3,000 undergraduates from 13 universities revealed that nearly 85% of students use AI for academic purposes. Alarmingly, one-third admitted to directly copying AI-generated content into their work.

The convenience AI offers can sometimes backfire. For instance, Lin used AI to generate multiple paper titles and frameworks in minutes. While this saved time, critics argue it erodes fundamental skills like critical analysis and originality.

Shifting Educational Priorities

AI’s integration into academia is reshaping how educators approach teaching. Professors now focus on developing skills that machines can’t replicate: creativity, emotional intelligence, and nuanced communication.

For example:

  • In-Class Activities: Some educators emphasize in-class assignments over take-home tasks to ensure students actively engage with the material.
  • High-Level Skills: Translation professors train students to post-edit AI-generated drafts, emphasizing precision and cultural nuance.

“AI reduces workload but raises the bar,” said Sun Haiqin, a professor at Shanghai International Studies University. “Students must outperform machines by adding human insight and emotional depth.”

The Ethical Tightrope

One of the biggest challenges is detecting AI-generated content. Current methods lack the accuracy needed for definitive identification, requiring educators to rely on intuition and expertise.

Moreover, some AI tools generate exaggerated or outright fabricated content, as noted by Liang Ziyin, an English graduate student. Her experience highlights the need for students to verify AI-generated information rigorously.

The Future of Education in the AI Era

As technology evolves, so must education. Universities are reimagining how to evaluate student performance, emphasizing irreplaceable human skills.

Key takeaways for students and educators:

We read all the AI news and test the best tools so you don’t have to. Then we send 30,000+ profesionnals a weekly email showing how to leverage it all to: 📈 Increase their income 🚀 Get more done ⚡ Save time.

  • Use AI Responsibly: AI should complement, not replace, human effort.
  • Focus on Irreplaceable Skills: Prioritize creativity, emotional intelligence, and critical thinking.
  • Adapt to New Tools: Embrace AI as a learning aid, not a shortcut.

AI is here to stay, and its role in academia will only grow. The challenge lies in striking the right balance – leveraging technology to enhance learning while preserving the essence of human creativity and effort.

Allowed AI UsesProhibited AI Uses
Literature reviewDrafting thesis structures
Data visualizationSummarizing conclusions
Reference managementDesigning research frameworks

A Call for Collaboration

The rise of AI in education isn’t about replacing human effort; it’s about collaboration. By embracing this technology responsibly, students and educators can create a learning environment that combines the best of human creativity with the efficiency of machines.

In this new era, the question isn’t whether AI should be part of education – it’s how we can make the most of it.

We read all the AI news and test the best tools so you don’t have to. Then we send 30,000+ profesionnals a weekly email showing how to leverage it all to: 📈 Increase their income 🚀 Get more done ⚡ Save time.